A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of your legislation laid down through the Supreme Court while in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. So, the competent authority of the parent department of the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent is likewise directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, selling a more informed and just society.
maintaining the conviction awarded on the appellant reduce the sentence on the appellant from imprisonment for life to one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
R.O, Office, Gujranwala and the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade of your accused hasn't been conducted nevertheless. In the instant case, now the accused tried to take advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture on the petitioner was greatly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity of your accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance on the accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly with the witness to detect the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer set a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and manufactured images. Besides, the images shown to the media reveal that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to hide his identity until he was place up for an identification parade. Making photos from the accused publically, both by showing the same into the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or plan, would create doubt while in the proceedings of your identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to ensure that there isn't any probability to the witness to begin to see the accused before going for the identification parade. The accused should not be shown into the witness in person or through any other method, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or maybe the press or electronic media. Supplied the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
Reasonable grounds are offered about the record to attach the petitioner with the commission in the alleged offence. Nevertheless punishment in the alleged offence does not fall while in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. nevertheless realized Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. website 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is from the credit on the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls during the exception where bail cannot be granted even during the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steering has actually been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion in the same is hereby reproduced:
The ruling of your first court created case law that must be followed by other courts right up until or Except possibly new law is created, or a higher court rules differently.
6. Mere involvement inside of a heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for that concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, given that then He's powering the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more required for further investigation, therefore, his constant incarceration would not provide any advantageous purpose at this stage.
The regulation as founded in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Please note, If you're seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report for the court, the worker elaborated about the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
ten. Without touching the merits on the case on the issue of annual increases while in the pensionary emoluments of your petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, these once-a-year increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment for being made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to the healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions during the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it can be important that the case set up the application with the precautionary principle where there is actually a danger to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations with the State in protecting the right to some clean and healthy environment.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are established by executive businesses based on statutes.